A hydrologically and biologically complex proglacial lake system at the margins of the collapsing Laurentide Ice Sheet
Graham H. Edwards
1
, Gavin Piccione
2
, Luke Moreton
1
, Emma Rose Garrett
1
, David Jones
3
, Clara Danhof
3
1
Trinity University (San Antonio, TX),
2
Brown University (Providence, RI, U.S.A.),
3
Amherst College (Amherst, MA, U.S.A.)
IPCC, AR6, WG1, Fig. 9.18
IPCC, AR6, WG1, Fig. 9.17
Proglacial lakes & wetlands are/will be
emergent, dynamic environments
in the modern warming climate.
Glacial Lake Hitchcock (GLH)
Dalton+2023, Ridge+2012, McGann+2024, Springston+2024
Connecticut River Valley
G.H. Edwards
North American Varve Chronology
Precisely calibrated varve chronology of GLH, spanning 18.2–12.5 ka.
Well-established Laurentide Ice Sheet retreat and GLH residence
Antevs 1922, Stone+2025
Lacustrine environment less well-described.
Ridge et al (2012), https://varves.as.tufts.edu/
Carbonate concretions / claybabies
Non-displacive, formed through oxidation of local org-C
Wu+2021
Thanks to Sophie Shipman for polishing cross-section surfaces.
Carbonate concretions / claybabies
Non-displacive, formed through oxidation of local org-C
Wu+2021
Reconstructing the hydrochemistry of the GLH proglacial lacustrine system.
Reconstructing the hydrochemistry of the GLH proglacial lacustrine system.
Field transect of the former GLH basin
Carbonate concretions
Isotope & trace element geochemistry
Bulk sediment
Ostracod and clay geochemistry
Sediment cores
Chronometric calibration with NAVC
Stable isotopes
Stable isotopes
Carbonate — concretions & ostracod valves
Stable isotopes
Carbonate — concretions & ostracod valves
↓T → ↓ δ
18
O
Stable isotopes
Carbonate — concretions & ostracod valves
Modern precipitation: -7 ≤ δ
18
O ≤ -10 ‰
Terzer-Wassmuth+2021
Similar δ
18
O for SN ostracods and concretions
Danhof 2025
Concretion-forming waters ≈ lakewater
S→N transect of ↓δ
18
O (MVR, MB, WR)
Proximity to ice sheet margin?
Stable isotopes
Clays
Stable isotopes
Clays
Overestimate: δ
18
O ≤ 19 ‰ for T = 0°C
Clay formation in (sub)glacial waters
Basal LIS δ
18
O composition?
Barnes Ice Cap basal ice: δ
18
O≈−25 ‰
Zdanowicz+2002
N. Amer. fossil groundwaters: −12 ≤ δ
18
O ≤ −25 ‰
Ferguson & Jasechko 2015
Trace elements
Li, Na, Mg, Ca,
Mn
, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Sr, Ba, Pb, Th,
U
Elevated Mn
Elevated Mn
Redox
Reducing conditions → high-Mn carbonate
Wittkop+2020
Fe-Mn oxide formation
Dean+1981
Reducing conditions → Mn
2+
Oxidizing conditions → MnO
2
Several reduction/oxidation cycles
↑ Mn → ↓ δ
13
C
Emerging story
Concretions form shortly after sediment deposition
Spatiotemporal variability → environmental diversity
Local/littoral processes dominate record
Complex shallow sediment biogeochemistry
Intense subglacial chemical weathering
Answers coming soon!
U-series ages (up to 10 ppm U)
Clumped carbonate isotopes
Conclusions
Carbonate concretions are a promising archive of proglacial environment
Forthcoming geochronology to better evaluate
how
Robust evidence for complex (post)GLH biogeochemistry and hydrology
Poster 60-54
Modern Problems Require Ancient Lakes: The Chronology and Chemistry of Glacial Lake Hitchcock
gedward1@trinity.edu
Acknowledgements:
Jack Ridge, Al Werner, and assorted (NE) Friends of the Pleistocene.